That last bolded red part is where he’ll flip to save himself or in an attempt to minimize his sentencing.

————————————————————————————————

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN OF NEW YORK

SEALED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INDICTMENT
v. 19 Cr.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant. .

COUNT ONE

(Sex Trafficking Conspiracy)

The Grand Jury charges:

OVERVIEW

1. As set forth herein, over the course of many
years, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, sexually exploited and-
abused dozens of minor girls at his homes in Manhattan, New.
York, and Palm Beach, Florida, among other locations.

2. ‘In particular, from at least in or about 2002, up
to and including at least in or about 2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and
recruited, minor girls to visit his mansion in Manhattan, New
York (the ?New York Residence?) and his estate in Palm Beach,
Florida (the ?Palm Beach Residence?) to engage in sex acts with
him, after which he would give the victims hundreds of dollars
in cash. Moreover, and in order to maintain and increase his
supply of victims, EPSTEIN also paid certain of his victims to

recruit additional girls to be similarly abused by EPSTEIN. In
this way, EPSTEIN created a vast network of underage victims for
him to sexually exploit in.locations including New York and
Palm Beach.

3. The victims described herein were as young as 14
years old at the time they were abused by JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, and were, for various reasons, often particularly
vulnerable to exploitation. EPSTEIN intentionally sought out
minors and knew that many of his victims were in fact under the
‘age of 18, including because, in some instances, minor victims
expressly told him their age.

4. In creating and maintaining this network of minor
victims in multiple states to sexually abuse and exploit,
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, worked and conspired with
others, including employees and associates who facilitated his
conduct by, among other things, contacting victims and
scheduling their sexual encounters with EPSTEIN at the New York
Residence and at the Palm Beach Residence.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

5. During all time periods charged in this
Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, was a financier with
multiple residences in the continental United States, including
the New York Residence and the Palm Beach Residence.

6. Beginning in at least 2002, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and recruited, dozens of minor girls to engage in sex acts with him,
after which EPSTEIN paid the victims hundreds of dollars in
cash, at the New York Residence and the Palm Beach Residence.

7. In both New York and Florida, JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
the defendant, perpetuated this abuse in similar ways. Victims
were initially recruited to provide ?massages? to EPSTEIN, which
would be performed nude or partially nude, would become
increasingly sexual in nature, and would typically include one
or more sex acts. EPSTEIN paid his victims hundreds of dollars
in cash for each encounter. Moreover, EPSTEIN actively
encouraged certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to
be similarly sexually abused. EPSTEIN incentivized his victims
to become recruiters by paying these victim?recruiters hundreds
of dollars for each girl that they brought to EPSTEIN. In so
doing, EPSTEIN maintained a steady supply of new victims to
exploit. .

The New York Residence

8. At all times relevant to this Indictment, JEFFREY
EPSIEIN, the defendant, possessed and controlled a multi?story
private residence on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, New York,
the New York Residence. Between at least in or about 2002
and in or about 2005, EPSTEIN abused numerous minor victims at
the New York Residence by causing these victims to be recruited

to engage in paid sex acts with him.

9. When a victim arrived at the New York Residence,
she typically would be escorted to a room with a massage table,
where she would perform a massage on JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant. The victims, who were as young as 14 years of age,
were told by or other individuals to partially or fully
undress before beginning the ?massage.? During the encounter,
EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of physical contact
with his victim to include, among other things, sex acts such as
groping and direct and indirect contact with the victim?s
genitals. EPSTEIN typically would also masturbate during these
sexualized encounters, ask victims to\touch him while he
masturbated, and touch victims? genitals with his hands or with
sex toys.

10. In connection with each sexual encounter, JEFFREY
EPSTEIN, the defendant, or one of his employees or associates,
paid the victim in cash. Victims typically were paid hundreds
of dollars in cash for each encounter.

ll. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, knew that many of
his New York victims were underage, including because certain
victims told him their age. Further, once these minor victims
were recruited, many were abused by EPSTEIN on multiple
subsequent occasions at the New York Residence. EPSTEIN
sometimes personally contacted victims to schedule appointments

at the New York Residence. In other instances, EPSTEIN directed
employees and associates, including a New York based employee
(?Employee?l?), to communicate with victims via phone to arrange
for these victims to return to the New York Residence for
additional sexual encounters with EPSTEIN.

12. Additionally, and to further facilitate his
ability to abuse minor girls in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, asked and enticed certain of his victims to recruit
additional girls to perform ?massages? and similarly engage in
VseX acts with EPSTEIN. When a victim_would recruit another girl
for EPSTEIN, he paid both the victim?recruiter and the new
victim hundreds of dollars in cash. Through these victim?

recruiters, EPSTEIN gained access to and was able to abuse

dozens of additional minor girls.

l3.? In particular, certain recruiters brought dozens
of additional minor girls to the New York Residence to give
massages to and engage in sex acts with JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant. EPSTEIN encouraged victims to recruit additional
girls by offering to pay these victim recruiters for every
additional girl they brought to EPSTEIN. When a victim?
recruiter accompanied a new minor victim to the New York
Residence, both the victim?recruiter and the new minor victim
were paid hundreds of dollars by EPSTEIN for each encounter, In

addition, certain victim?recruiters routinely scheduled these
encounters through Employee?l, who sometimes asked the
recruiters to bring a specific minor girl for EPSTEIN.
The Palm Beach Residence I 4

14. In addition to recruiting and abusing minor girls
in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, created a similar
network of minor girls to victimize in Palm Beach, Florida,
where EPSTEIN owned, possessed and controlled another large
residence, the Palm Beach Residence. EPSTEIN frequently
traveled from New York to Palm Beach by private jet, before
which an employee or associate would ensure that minor victims
were available for encounters upon his arrival in Florida.

15. At the Palm Beach Residence, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, engaged in a similar course of abusive conduct.
When a victim initially arrived at the Palm Beach Residence, she
would be escorted to a room, sometimes by an employee of
including, at times, two assistants (?Employee?2? and?
?Employee~3?) who, as described herein, Were also responsible
for scheduling sexual encounters with minor victims. Once
inside, the victim would provide a nude or semi?nude massage for
EPSTEIN, who would himself typically be naked. During these
encounters, EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of the
physical contact to include sex acts such as groping and direct
and indirect contact with the victim?s genitals. EPSTEIN would

also typically masturbate during these encounters, ask victims
to touch him while he masturbated, and touch Victims? genitals

with his hands or with sex toys.

16. In connection with each sexual encounter, JEFFREY
EPSTEIN, the defendant, or one of his employees or associates,
paid the victim in cash. Victims typically were paid hundreds
of dollars for each encounter.

17. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, knew that certain
of his victims were underage, including because certain victims
told him their age. In addition, as with New York~based
victims, many Florida victims, once recruited, were abused by

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, on multiple additional

occasions.

l8. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, who during the
relevant time period was frequently in New York, would arrange
for Employee?2 or other employees to contact victims by phone in
advance of travel to Florida to ensure appointments
were scheduled for when he arrived. In particular, in certain
instances, Employee?2 placed phone calls to minor victims in
Florida to schedule encounters at the Palm Beach Residence. At
the time of certain of those phone calls, EPSTEIN and Employee?2
were in New York, New York. Additionally, certain of the
individuals victimized at the Palm Beach Residence were

contacted by phone by Employee?3 to schedule these encounters.
19. Moreover, as in New York, to ensure a steady
stream of minor victims, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, asked
and enticed certain victims in Florida to recruit other girls to
engage in sex acts. EFSTEIN paid hundreds of dollars to victimw
recruiters for each additional girl they brought to the Palm
Beach Residence.

STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS

20. From at least in or about 2002, up to and
including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York
and elsewhere, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known
and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire,
confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an
offense against the United States, to wit, sex trafficking of
minors, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section_
1591(a) and

21. It was a part and object of the conspiracy that
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known and unknown,
would and did, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce,
recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain, by any
means a person, and to benefit, financially and by receiving
anything of value, from participation in a venture which has
engaged in any such act, knowing that the person had not
attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a
commercial sex act, in violation of Title 18, United States
Code, Sections 1591(a) and
Overt Acts
22. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect
the illegal object thereof, the following overt acts, among
others, were committed in the Southern District of New York and
elsewhere:

a. In or about 2004, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the
defendant, enticed and recruited multiple minor victims,
including minor victims identified herein as Minor Victim?l,
Minor Victim?2, and Minor Victim?3, to engage in sex acts with
EPSTEIN at his residences in Manhattan, New York, and Palm,
Beach, Florida, after which he provided them with hundreds of
dollars in cash for each encounter.

b. In or about 2002, Minor Victim?l was
recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly
sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the New York Residence over a
period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars for each
encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victims
to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she
did. EPSTEIN asked Minor Victim?l how old she was, and Minor
Victim?l answered truthfully.

c. In or about 2004, Employee, located in the
Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed
a telephone call to Minor Victim?l in order to schedule an

appointment for Minor Victim?1 to engage in paid sex acts with

EPSTEIN.

d. In or about 2004, Minor Victim~2 was
recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly
sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach Residence over a
period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars after each
encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim?2
to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she
did.

e. In or about 2005, located in the
Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed
a telephone call to Minor Victim?2 in order to schedule an
appointment for Minor Victim?2 to engage in paid sex acts with

EPSTEIN.

f. In or about 2005, Minor Victim?3 was
recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly
sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach Residence over a
period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars for each
encounter. also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim?3
to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she
did. EPSTEIN asked Minor Victim-3 how old she was, and Minor
Victim-3 answered truthfully.

10
g. In or about 2005, Employee?2, located in the
Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed
a telephone call to Minor Victimm3 in Florida in order to

schedule an appointment for Minor Victim?3 to engage in paid sex

acts with EPSTEIN.

h. In or about 2004, Employee?3 placed a
telephone call to Minor Victim?3 in order to schedule an
appointment for Minor Victim?3 to engage in paid sex acts with’
EPSTEIN. I

(Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.)

COUNT TWO
(Sex Trafficking)

The Grand Jury further charges:

23. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1
through 19 and 22 of this Indictment are repeated and realleged
as if fully set forth within.

24. From.at least in or about 2002, up to and
including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New
York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, willfully and knowingly,
in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, did recruit,
entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain by any means a
person, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18
years and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act, and

did aid and abet the same, to wit, EPSTEIN recruited, enticed,

harbored, transported, provided, and obtained numerous

ll
individuals who were less than 18 years old, including but not
limited to Minor Victim?1, as described above, and who were then
caused to engage in at least one commercial sex act in

Manhattan, New York.

(Title 18, United.States Code, Sections 1591(a),
and 2.)

FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS

25. As a result of committing the offense alleged in
Count Two of this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant,
shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 1594(c)(1), any property, real and
personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to
facilitate the commission of the offense alleged in Count Two,
and any property, real or personal, constituting or derived from
any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of
the offense alleged in Count Two, or any property traceable to
such property, and the following specific property:

a. The lot or parcel of land, together with its

buildings, appurtenances, improvements, fixtures, attachments
and easements, located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New

York, with block number 1386 and lot number 10, owned by

Maple, Inc.

12

Substitute Asset Provision
26. If any of the above described forfeitable
property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:
cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a
third person;
has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;
has been substantially diminished in value; or
has been commingled with other property which cannot
be subdivided without difficulty;
it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
853(p) and 28 2461(c), to seek forfeiture of any
other property of the defendant up to the value of the above

forfeitable property.

(Title l8, United States Code, Section 1594; Title 21,
United States Code, Section 853(p); and
Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461.)

FEIEPERSON BERMAN
fl United States Attorney
. A

Form NO. (Ed. 9?25?58)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendant.

(l8 U.S.C. 371, 1591(a),
– and 2)

GEOFFREY S. BERMAN

United States Attorney

l4

 

---

Jeffrey Epstein scandal: women with new identities run firms from Epstein-linked property

 Two women questioned about Prince Andrew in 2010, operating businesses from New York property years after appearing to have left Epstein’s entourage

Jon Swaine in New York

 @jonswaine

Wed 7 Jan 2015 20.04 GMTLast modified on Fri 14 Jul 2017 22.34 BST