2 TB For Life! 65% Off pCloud Lifetime

Uncategorized

After Backlash, Google Turns Off “Newspeak” Correction Tool (For Now)

“Weā€™re looking more carefully at the inclusive language suggestions and have paused those for further review while we continue to improve this feature.”

By Steve Watson

Google claims that it has disabled a feature within its document editor that was correcting language to make it ā€˜more inclusiveā€™, but only while it refines the tool to make it work more effectively.

As we reported Monday, Google Docs was trialling ā€˜inclusive warningsā€™, which act like a language checker, suggesting that users refrain from using terms such as ā€˜policemanā€™ or ā€˜landlordā€™, because they are gendered, and words like ā€˜fierceā€™ and ā€˜annoyedā€™ for being threatening.

Critics (even ones with rainbow flags in the bio) compared the move to the Ministry of Truth from Orwellā€™s 1984, policing language and making sure that its Newspeak is implemented whenever necessary.

Now, following the backlash, The Daily Wire notes that Google is pausing the tool.

Google spokeswoman Jenny Thomson told the outlet that ā€œinclusive language suggestionsā€”an assisted writing featureā€”can over or undercorrect certain phrases. Weā€™re looking more carefully at the inclusive language suggestions and have paused those for further review while we continue to improve this feature.ā€

In a creepy admission, Thomson noted that the feature is ā€œa form of AI that uses language understanding models, based on millions of common phrases and sentences, to automatically learn how people communicate and suggest changes.ā€

In comments to the Telegraph, Big Brother Watchā€™s Silkie Carlo urged that ā€œGoogleā€™s new word warnings arenā€™t assistive, theyā€™re deeply intrusive,ā€ adding that ā€œThis speech-policing is profoundly clumsy, creepy and wrong, often reinforcing bias.ā€

The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible.

There was no vocabulary expressing the function of Science as a habit of mind, or a method of thought irrespective of its particular branches. There was, indeed, no word for ā€˜Science,ā€™ any meaning that it could possibly bear being already sufficiently covered by the word Ingsoc.

Q
BREAKING-NEWS.CA