Why do you hate Ivermectin? Who told you it was bad?
According to the W.H.O. Remdesivir increases your risk of Kidney Failure 20 fold.
This was made clear to Washington DC (as if it was not already) by Dr. Marik, Chairman of the Front Line COVID -19 Critical Care Alliance. US Senator Ron Johnson witnessed his testimony, it was recorded. It is what it is.
Because I am not writing to bash Remdesivir all on it’s own (I will not site the other organ damage it can and does do).
That being said if you are ever in a position to be offered it as a “treatment” you have the right to see the medical labelling. You are looking for what are called āBlack Box Warningā.
Got it? Black Box Warnings…
What they are for: “Communicating risk – The warnings are intended to call attention to certain risks or instructions so that healthcare professionals will be aware of them and carefully consider them when prescribing medications to patients.”
YOU have the right to see the medical labelling on any drug or serum etc., you or someone else “administers” to you. You must be afforded full and meaningful disclosure so you can give informed consent. Who’s consent? Your consent. Consent, Informed consent cannot be unless there is full and meaningful disclosure ergo you have the right to access the Back Box Warnings.
At least with Remdesivir they have a product insert with an ingredients list and “Black Box Warnings” like most drugs, including vaccines, that is except for the current EUA Experimental Synthetic Genetic mRNA gene therapies aka COVID-19 Vaccines and Bivant flavours from such makers as Pfizer.
Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine according to the same W.H.O. who will tell you that Remdesivir increases your risk of Kidney Failure 20 fold, has both these naturally occurring and mass synthesized “drugs” on the top 100 must haves for mankind. Not only is how effective they are for what they can do for MANY illnesses that makes them that valuable they can and are used with great safety and use on most people and animals.
So lets just look at them from what they are, prior to COVID and let us agree that they still remain as they are post COVID. incredible remedies and treatments for many many things.
Why do you hate Ivermectin? Who told you it was bad?
It was the WHO, they laid out some guidelines, and the Media / social media had to say nothing but that. For real, anything that did not keep up with the WHO’s ever evolving position on this and that re COVID was forbidden. No wonder how perhaps you and many people you know came to think and believe it was “horse paste”. We are talking about life and death for some and who would put up with talk about Ivermectin what the media decided to message as being a “Horse Paste” and “important” people where having a good long laugh at anyone sharing any of the clinical data on it’s use for COVID provocatively and post infection.
Why anyone would stomp on the research that ultimately did establish it works when it was for the benefit of the whole of mankind, cheap to make and well tolerated by most of humanity, it makes no sense unless there was an agenda. In the absence of such compassion and foresight it was IMHO just cruel and wicked.
What was wicked as well was while the WHO was pushing experimental mRNA gene therapies, they had this published on the record.
in the analysis of MORTALTY when IVERMECTIN was used as a treatment, this is what the WHO knew, and decided to downgraded without a clear substantiation of it.
READ: “Reporting a risk reduction of 81% (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.09ā0.36), the effect estimate favoring ivermectin was downgraded by 2 levels for imprecision, although the justification for this is unclear as the reported CI is precise (64%ā91%).”
No matter why they levelled it down, how could anyone (media and health authority’s alike) or you throw out a 81% RISK REDUCTION IN MORTALITY or that used as a prophylaxis by front line hospital staff in Argentina and India they saw total protection (zero infections) where infection rates in the control group exceeded 50%!
Why because of “Horse Paste”, because it is “misinformation” even though it is the WHO’s own published data?
It is for most people, Dr.’s and nurses etc. included because where told it was bad and that there was no other treatments but Remdesivir and or an EUA Experimental Synthetic Genetic mRNA Gene Therapy aka COVID-19 Vaccine. Anything else is not following the science and horse shite, you should be ashamed of yourself, get banned off of the internet and loose your licence if you say otherwise.
One of the most important findings I have come across, and I have seen my share of study data on this is via the American Journal of Therapeutics. They are the ones who should be in the know about it as a therapy and guess what? They know!
“Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines”
American Journal of Therapeutics 28(4):p e434-e460, July/August 2021. | DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402
“Conclusions:Ā
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.
Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”
(How we know the WHO knew)
“The recently updated WHO therapeutics guidelines included 7 trials and 1419 people in the analysis of mortality. Reporting a risk reduction of 81% (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.09ā0.36), the effect estimate favoring ivermectin was downgraded by 2 levels for imprecision, although the justification for this is unclear as the reported CI is precise (64%ā91%).”
In addition to the evidence from systematic reviews, the findings of several controlled observational studies are consistent with existing evidence and suggest improved outcomes with ivermectin treatment.55,57,59 Similarly, with respect to ivermectin prophylaxis of frontline workers and those at risk, controlled observational studies from Bangladesh and Argentina (the latter which involved 1195 health care workers) have shown apparent reductions in COVID-19 transmission with ivermectin prophylaxis, including in some reports total protection (zero infections) where infection rates in the control group exceeded 50%.122,123 A very large trial of ivermectin prophylaxis in health care workers in India124 covered 3532 participants and reported risk ratios not significantly different from this meta-analysis (prophylaxis outcome).”
Source:
————————————————————————————————————————————————
Moving on to Hydroxychloroquine… Why do you hate Hydroxychloroquine? Who told you it was bad?
Again It was the W.H.O., they laid out some guidelines, and the Media Outlets and / social media sites had to say nothing but that.
It was not just the lab synthesized Hydroxychloroquine, it was also Cinchona Officinalis. Cinchona Officinalis was piratically embargoed. Cinchona Officinalis is where quinine/s of which one powerful one just happens to be Hydroxychloroquine comes from and is derived from – Nature.
Read: Cinchona officinalis is a South American tree in the family Rubiaceae. It is native to wet montane forests in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia, between 1600ā2700 meters above sea level. Wikipedia
Scientific name: Cinchona officinalis
Family: Rubiaceae
Order: Gentianales
Higher classification: Quina
It is what gives tonic water it’s bitter taste, it is used to treat malaria, it is used to treat Lupus and arthritis, it is used for many things in both manufactured and natural forms.
Naturally it is being cultivated and used all over the world where the growing conditions permit it. In Sri Lanka and India they call it the “Fever Tree”. Care to Guess Why? It works at treating viral infections including cold / flu viruses or what are called “corona viruses”.
It is a phenomenal ionizer of minerals such as zinc and as a result it very effectively assists those ions to dock / lock into the receptors of your healthy uninfected cells so that when a virus come across the path of those cells they find there is not corona receptor to dock with as it is occupied by a zinc, silver, gold ion.
The question is does it work or help in the treatment of SARS-2 COVID-19?
Chloroquine & hydroxychloroquine
“In COVID-19, CQ and HCQ impede the virus entry into the cells by interfering in ACE2 glycosylation and decreasing ACE2 affinity for the coronavirus S protein. Furthermore, CQ/HCQ is known to interfere with the TLR pathway involved in proinflammatory cytokine signaling. Inhibition of endosomal/lysosomal acidification by preventing pH reduction to prevent the release of the viral genome into the host cell cytoplasm is suggested to be another mechanism.”
“There are several studies, in vitro and in vivo, that show CQ and HCQ which affect various viruses, including influenza, HIV as well as SARS coronaviruses. In SARS coronavirusesĀ their effects are attributed to impaired ACE2 receptor glycosylation [72ā76]. In an in vitro study by Hu et al. for the evaluation of cytotoxicity and anti-SARS-CoV-2 effects of CQ and HCQ using Vero E6 cells 273.20 and 249.50Ā Ī¼m were indicated to be cytotoxic concentration, respectively. Thus, the dose-response curves of both drugs showed a noticeable effect on SARS-CoV-2, although the antivirus activity of CQ was higher than that of HCQ. Moreover, they were shown to inhibit the entry of the virus into host cells [72]. A similar study using the same cell line by Wang et al. showed the inhibitory effects of CQ alone or in combination with remdesivir; although the CQ itself was more effective than its combined form to control COVID-19 infection in vitro [75]. Using in vitro data and analysis by a specific computational method, Yao et al. conducted a study to determine the optimal dose of HCQ and CQ to use in the clinic. They found that HCQ has a more potent effect compared with CQ (EC50Ā =Ā 0.72 vs 5.47Ā Ī¼m) on SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Based on their analysis, a 400-mg HCQ and 200-mg CQ twice daily for 4Ā days is the optimal range [76].”
Source: https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/fvl-2021-0160
If Remdesivir was so safe and effective why was it not prescribed as a prophylaxis to healthcare workers and as an early treatment to you?… To many Black Box Warnings perhaps…?
So many questions and it made discerning people thinkers in a dangerous time.
ALL HOSPITALS IN THE USA ARE BEING BRIBED BY MEDICARE TO USE REMDESIVIR for COVID 19 FOR MEDICARE PATIENTS. WATCH THIS VIDEO! NEW DETAILS!
https://twitter.com/freedomfight369/status/1502637152986820614
Full video here: https://senatormastriano.com/medicalfreedompanel/?wvideo=90wx9ec5l7
What is a CMS in Medicare?
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provides health coverage to more than 100 million people through Medicare, Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and the Health Insurance Marketplace.
A Heads up on Remdesivir with hospitals trying to confuse people by using a different name for it.
Why would they do this? pic.twitter.com/6rE799jOhd
— Janey (@_Janey_Jay) December 21, 2022
So, if you go into the hospital and you know to avoid Remdesevir, and TELL them you don’t want Remdesevir, they say…..okay, we won’t give you Remdesevir, but we will give you Veklury, instead. But Veklury IS Remdesivir!
And DEFINITELY watch the entire video at this LINK: https://senatormastriano.com/medicalfreedompanel/?wvideo=90wx9ec5l7
In closing as with all medical treatments, including drugs, it is your right to know the facts. It is the law, to think or feel differently is simply not the truth, if you are led to think or feel that your seeking full and meaningful disclosure so you can
